Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-29-2015, 11:33 AM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Big Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Steppes of Central Indiana
Posts: 1,319

The Red Baron - '00 Ford F-350 XLT
90 day: 27.99 mpg (US)

Impala Phase Zero - '96 Chevrolet Impala SS
90 day: 21.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 186 Times in 127 Posts
Dymaxion Deathtrap

Good aero. Terrible car.

A Harrowing Test Drive of Buckminster Fuller's 1933 Dymaxion Car: Art That's Scary to Ride | Open Culture

A car that steers like a fork truck. No wonder it never caught on. One wonders if a better chassis under that sleek shape wouldn’t have helped.

__________________
2000 Ford F-350 SC 4x2 6 Speed Manual
4" Slam
3.08:1 gears and Gear Vendor Overdrive
Rubber Conveyor Belt Air Dam
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Big Dave For This Useful Post:
aerohead (04-29-2015), NeilBlanchard (04-30-2015)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-29-2015, 01:37 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 568
Thanks: 1
Thanked 73 Times in 58 Posts
Aptly, this video describes this as like driving a taildragger plane down the road. That's because rear steering is inherently unstable. Makes for a small turning radius, though.

Put the steering in front and she's stable: A teaching aid used in aeronautical engineering classes is a tricycle with fixed wheels on two corners and a castering wheel on the third. Roll it down an incline with the castering wheel in front, and she rolls straight and stable. Turn it around and roll it with the castering wheel at rear, she darts off to the side and ground loops.

That's why steered nose wheel tricycle landing gear is on the vast majority of modern aircraft, despite the extra weight of the nose wheel.

Buckminster Fuller was brilliant, but his car would have been vastly better had he at least had the front wheels steering, as is done on some modern motorcycle tricycles.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Otto For This Useful Post:
BamZipPow (04-29-2015)
Old 04-29-2015, 01:38 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 447

Valerie - '03 Honda Civic DX
Team Honda
90 day: 55.79 mpg (US)
Thanks: 277
Thanked 231 Times in 105 Posts
Yeah... I think if it were FRONT steer, it would probably be a lot better. This makes me think of how (easy or difficult) it would be to convert a FF car to a 3 wheeler... slap on an aero body and call it a day.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2015, 04:48 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,562
Thanks: 7,738
Thanked 8,554 Times in 7,041 Posts
What a happy day for me. <<does a little dance in chair>>

This is an excellent video for a number of reasons. For one, this is not Sir Norman Foster's replica of Dymaxion #3. This is the Ur-Dymaxion replicated. I love the canvas top and off-the-shelf spotlight tuned periscope.

On to the handling: Bucky wasn't building a car. He was building a test vehicle to test the ground handling characteristics of his real goal—the Omni-Directional Transport—which was to be VTOL. That's why it handles like a tail-dragger. There was also a complete redesign of the chassis in #2 and #3. [From memory] the '3-hinge' and '2-hinge' designs.

Here's a pre-#1 design:

I think ultimately 3-wheel drive and 3-wheel steering would be optimal, but differential braking in front might be sufficient. Especially when the plan is to fly the rear wheel preparatory to takeoff.

In short, the vehicle, and the fact that it exists, is excellent. He should park it in a chopped Butler grain elevator!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
aerohead (05-01-2015)
Old 04-29-2015, 05:04 PM   #5 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
This picture better illustrates the Dymaxian's original "aircraft" intentions:




"back-of-the-napkin" sketches:

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to gone-ot For This Useful Post:
aerohead (05-01-2015)
Old 04-29-2015, 07:37 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,562
Thanks: 7,738
Thanked 8,554 Times in 7,041 Posts
Also the Isamu Noguchi model:

http://greg.org/archive/2008/12/07/fuller_x_noguchi_colabo_dymaxion_car_model.html


...of which; according to the link it sold for $92,500 at Southby's in 2008!

The [Mechanix Illustrated?] cut-away shows the 'air keel' which disappeared in the real-world Dymaxions. Also missing triangulation in the frame above the front shock mounts. I suspect these pictures were by a magazine staff artist from descriptions.

The first unbuilt Dymaxion (#4) was to be a 6-tired tricycle with inhub motors. And an extensible tailboom for a variable wheelbase.

________

Edit: There's a lot of news at

http://blog.hemmings.com/index.php/t...inster-fuller/

Build details of the new replica, #2 has been restored, and original blueprint drawings were found in a random house attic.

Last edited by freebeard; 04-29-2015 at 09:08 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
aerohead (05-01-2015)
Old 04-30-2015, 11:58 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Big Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Steppes of Central Indiana
Posts: 1,319

The Red Baron - '00 Ford F-350 XLT
90 day: 27.99 mpg (US)

Impala Phase Zero - '96 Chevrolet Impala SS
90 day: 21.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 186 Times in 127 Posts
I think there is scope for making Bucky's overall idea work. It just needs a little common sense engineering.

One approach might be to use the chassis of one of the Bombardier "tadpole" motorcycles. They are front-steering and a single rear drive wheel. That might be the perfect chassis for a 'Dymaxion' tandem-seat car.
__________________
2000 Ford F-350 SC 4x2 6 Speed Manual
4" Slam
3.08:1 gears and Gear Vendor Overdrive
Rubber Conveyor Belt Air Dam
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Big Dave For This Useful Post:
aerohead (05-01-2015)
Old 04-30-2015, 12:23 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master Novice
 
elhigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314

Josie - '87 Toyota Pickup
90 day: 40.02 mpg (US)

Felicia - '09 Toyota Prius Base
90 day: 49.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
The thing about that taildragger designs is that as the tail swings out of line, forces tend to pull it even farther so that it is dynamically unstable.

If the steering knuckle were behind the wheel instead of in front, it would tend to pull itself back into line. Tend, I say, but I also think that it would be subject to a nasty case of the wiggles at virtually any speed. It would need a mighty steering stabilizer and tight bushings to keep things civil.
__________________




Lead or follow. Either is fine.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2015, 01:16 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,013

Nameless - '06 GMC Canyon
90 day: 37.45 mpg (US)

22 Maverick - '22 Ford Maverick XL
90 day: 41.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 188
Thanked 466 Times in 287 Posts
All too true. I had a ride in the back seat of an Aeronca Champ once where the pilot went outside the runway lights twice on one side, and once on the other side of the runway. By pure luck, he did not hit anything or ground loop it.
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.

22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2015, 02:57 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,562
Thanks: 7,738
Thanked 8,554 Times in 7,041 Posts
Bucky knew that the ground handling characteristics of his Omni-Directional Transport was going to be the hardest part, while he was waiting for Harrier jump-jet-style takeoffs, without the Citroen or Cord FWD parts he needed. He said it always takes 3 pre-production prototypes to get it right. And everyone wanted to go to production at two. That's why he walked away from the Dymaxion House.

I've heard that tandem axle trucks do less slipping and sliding in mud, so maybe having two inline, no-steering wheels in back would be more stable. Like this:


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
niky (05-01-2015)
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com