06-17-2025, 02:04 PM
|
#111 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 13,172
Thanks: 4,421
Thanked 4,600 Times in 3,540 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4
|
LG just can't catch a break...
This makes one wish they could get a nuclear power plant in their back yard.
Have all the Gigawatt+ storage facilities had fire issues? Seems like whenever we hear about a new one that was built, we hear about a fire later.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
06-17-2025, 04:33 PM
|
#112 (permalink)
|
Somewhat crazed
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,667
Thanks: 621
Thanked 1,289 Times in 1,138 Posts
|
Afaik, the only reason they should get hot is rapid charge/discharge with inadequate cooling. Not in use Storage temps go a lot higher and lower. So birdnest or tumbleweed in the ridicously small radiator and they should go offline. That might start a cascade, but just speculation by myself. Always does start in weakest cell however because it's nearest the fire conditions.
__________________
casual notes from the underground:There are some "experts" out there that in reality don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
|
|
|
06-17-2025, 05:32 PM
|
#113 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 13,172
Thanks: 4,421
Thanked 4,600 Times in 3,540 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piotrsko
Afaik, the only reason they should get hot is rapid charge/discharge with inadequate cooling. Not in use Storage temps go a lot higher and lower. So birdnest or tumbleweed in the ridicously small radiator and they should go offline. That might start a cascade, but just speculation by myself. Always does start in weakest cell however because it's nearest the fire conditions.
|
I don't know what LG is using for these batteries, but they had a manufacturing problem causing a bent anode and torn separator in their prismatic cells that lead to fires.
As I've been saying, a system that requires zero defects to prevent a cascading fire is not a well engineered one. Any individual cell failure, or battery bank, should not cause the entire system to burn to the ground.
|
|
|
06-18-2025, 09:44 AM
|
#114 (permalink)
|
Somewhat crazed
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,667
Thanks: 621
Thanked 1,289 Times in 1,138 Posts
|
Agreed that a (battery [module]) failure shouldn't cause a fire, BUT, it has. Any where there is densely packed highly reactive components stuffed into a box.
__________________
casual notes from the underground:There are some "experts" out there that in reality don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
|
|
|
06-18-2025, 11:49 AM
|
#115 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 13,172
Thanks: 4,421
Thanked 4,600 Times in 3,540 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piotrsko
Agreed that a (battery [module]) failure shouldn't cause a fire, BUT, it has. Any where there is densely packed highly reactive components stuffed into a box.
|
My point is the fire is the evidence of poor design. There should be enough separation, containment, or fire suppression of modules that runaway fire is extremely unlikely.
Ideally the system would be resilient against intentional damage, and especially unintentional failure.
|
|
|
06-18-2025, 12:11 PM
|
#116 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 29,892
Thanks: 8,528
Thanked 9,228 Times in 7,624 Posts
|
Do any batteries that do not contain Lithium present a fire hazard? Lead-acid? Nickel-iron? Zinc-carbon?
__________________
.
..Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
___________________
.
..Make the best use of what is in your power, and take the rest as it happens. -- Epictetus
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-18-2025, 12:57 PM
|
#117 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 13,172
Thanks: 4,421
Thanked 4,600 Times in 3,540 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
Do any batteries that do not contain Lithium present a fire hazard? Lead-acid? Nickel-iron? Zinc-carbon?
|
Even LiFePO4 are much less fire prone. I understand at scale they're more affordable too, so why isn't that chemistry being used in stationary applications?
The answer is probably that LG has their prismatic lines already ramped up, so they make what they have manufacturing capacity to make.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-18-2025, 02:13 PM
|
#118 (permalink)
|
Somewhat crazed
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,667
Thanks: 621
Thanked 1,289 Times in 1,138 Posts
|
You trade power density for more thermal stability. Lifepo4 is 2/3 power dense FLA is 50%. If you're commuting on the 605, kinda a benefit
Never exploded a FLA, YET.
__________________
casual notes from the underground:There are some "experts" out there that in reality don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Piotrsko For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-19-2025, 09:28 AM
|
#119 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: South Africa
Posts: 1,111
Thanks: 438
Thanked 469 Times in 403 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
Even LiFePO4 are much less fire prone. I understand at scale they're more affordable too, so why isn't that chemistry being used in stationary applications?
The answer is probably that LG has their prismatic lines already ramped up, so they make what they have manufacturing capacity to make.
|
The batteries used are 'Second Life':
ie:
Once the EV battery has reached less than 80% of its capacity the manufacturers are desperatly looking for an alternate use for them so that the whole recycling thing 'recedes in the rearview mirror' to the point where it's no longer their problem...
The LAST thing an EV maker wants now is the General Public becoming aware of/experiencing the HUGE, toxic recycling issue they are currently future-causing..!
When I looked; all these stationary batteries were in fact Second Life, mostly from EVs.
Hence the completely inappropriate chemistry AND the increased risk of faulty cells.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Logic For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-19-2025, 09:40 AM
|
#120 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: South Africa
Posts: 1,111
Thanks: 438
Thanked 469 Times in 403 Posts
|
China has banned EV battery fires:
https://www.google.com/search?q=chin...t=gws-wiz-serp
These guys are renown for trying to save 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 1 cents on everything!
But I think the prospect of "Life in a Chinese gulag' is very likely to deter this 'genetic defect', resulting in below spec batteries ending up being quietly dumped in the sea or something instead.
|
|
|
|