Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-23-2019, 01:05 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Finland
Posts: 43

Spanish whip - '12 Seat Ibiza ST E-Ecomotive 1.2 TDI
90 day: 53.84 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 16 Times in 11 Posts
Tire choice, 145/80R14 or 175/65R15

I need to buy new tires soon and IÂ’m wondering which is the right choice.

My original size is 185/60R15.

IÂ’m thinking of these sizes to replace them:
175/65R15
145/80R14

The 175/65R15 are available as fuel efficiency class A tires (Continental ecocontact 6). They are 1% larger than original.
The 145/80R14 are original Lupo 3L tires which have a C fuel efficiency rating (Bridgestone Ecopia B381). They are 2.5% smaller than original.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-23-2019, 08:12 AM   #2 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,260

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,565 Times in 2,829 Posts
Go with the 15 inch wheels.
14 is becoming a dead size to some tire manufacturers.
There is a big difference between a fuel economy A and fuel economy C. I put a pair of fuel economy C tires on my nissan leaf it really killed the range. I would have really been in trouble if I had replaced all 4.
And you don't want to go smaller on the diameter.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2019, 08:43 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,075

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 39.72 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,902
Thanked 2,560 Times in 1,586 Posts
A narrower tire will have less angular momentum and will decrease energy lost in stop and go traffic. It will also improve aerodynamics. However, an 80 aspect ratio is really tall, and suspension will be better tuned for the 175 width. The tread compound will probably hurt more than the rest helps. I doubt rolling resistance will be lower. I'd also vote for the 175's.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2019, 11:30 AM   #4 (permalink)
home of the odd vehicles
 
rmay635703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,887

Silver - '10 Chevy Cobalt XFE
Thanks: 503
Thanked 866 Times in 653 Posts
I would just throw on 165/65r14 RE92s in that application but I bet they don’t have them over there
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2019, 12:57 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Russellville, KY
Posts: 120

Little Blue Fuel Sipper - '16 Nissan Versa SV Sedan
Team Nissan
90 day: 45.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 36 Times in 27 Posts
The 175/65-15 is going to give you taller gearing than the 145/80-14. I went with tires that gave taller gearing on an '88 Ford Escort I used to drive and saw an increase in fuel mileage, but the tires I was using were 6.5% larger. Here's another vote for 175/65-14.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2019, 06:53 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: KY
Posts: 1,352

IGL - '04 Saturn Ion
Team Saturn
90 day: 56.19 mpg (US)
Thanks: 63
Thanked 366 Times in 269 Posts
I also vote for the 175s, diameter usually helps mileage, and the better compound will help by itself... I went 5.3% taller on my Saturn and gained mileage even though I also went wider
__________________
My current Ecotec project...


My last Ecotec project...
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2019, 09:43 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mpg_numbers_guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: VA
Posts: 1,372

Toby - '13 Toyota Prius C
Team Toyota
90 day: 63.99 mpg (US)

Daz - '15 Mazda 3 iTouring w/ Tech Package
Team Mazda
90 day: 38.2 mpg (US)
Thanks: 324
Thanked 483 Times in 368 Posts
The 175s have a much better rolling resistance rating. You'd have to pump up the 145 width tires to some pretty hefty PSI to match the 175s.

In most cases,
LRR > width
__________________
2013 Toyota Prius C 2 (my car)


2015 Mazda 3 iTouring Hatchback w/ Tech Package (wife's car)
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2019, 11:06 AM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by hege View Post
My original size is 185/60R15.

IÂ’m thinking of these sizes to replace them:
175/65R15
145/80R14

The 175/65R15 are available as fuel efficiency class A tires (Continental ecocontact 6). They are 1% larger than original.
The difference if FE isn't going to pay for a new set of wheels, or eat it all up, so no benefit ...

Far more expensive tyres might not recoup their investment in reduced fuel (depends on fuel price and FE of course).

The 175s are generally a bit cheaper (at least in Belgium) than the 185s.
But difference is minimal.
You can get the Nokian eLine2 in 185/60 ... AA rated and not excessively expensive

The 145/80s are C rated rather than A, and choice is very limited ...


Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
Go with the 15 inch wheels.
14 is becoming a dead size to some tire manufacturers.

And you don't want to go smaller on the diameter.
14" is still doing fairly OK in Europe

Smaller diameter rims are generally lighter
Metal is lighter than rubber, so diameter increases are best done using rubber rather than metal ...
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2019, 12:45 PM   #9 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,260

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,565 Times in 2,829 Posts
I saw a post on the nissan leaf forum where a guy got some ultra light weight racing wheels for his leaf.
New they were over $600 each, he got them second hand for cheap. These wheels where half the weight or about 10 pounds lighter than the stock wheels.
Only increased range by 2%.
You get more range than that just by going with a good LRR tire.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2019, 12:50 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,171

Sport Utility Prius - '10 Toyota Prius II
90 day: 52.98 mpg (US)

300k Sequoia 4WD - '01 Toyota Sequoia Limited 4wd
90 day: 20.19 mpg (US)
Thanks: 352
Thanked 267 Times in 214 Posts
Has anything beat the 165/65/14 re92?

__________________
"I feel like the bad decisions come into play when you trade too much of your time for money paying for things you can't really afford."
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com