EcoModder.com

EcoModder.com (https://ecomodder.com/forum/)
-   EcoModding Central (https://ecomodder.com/forum/ecomodding-central.html)
-   -   Tire and wheel update after 8500 miles (https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthread.php/tire-wheel-update-after-8500-miles-29740.html)

sully06 08-14-2014 08:14 PM

Tire and wheel update after 8500 miles
 
I have seen no discernible difference in mpg.

Old tires and wheels were 14 steel wheels(smooth wheel covers) with 195/70 goodyear viva 2 close to the end of their life at 50 psi

New tire and wheel combo 15 aluminium(off Honda Civic Hybrid) with 195/65 LLR tires with 58 psi.

Last weekend I made a very similar trip to one I had taken with the old setup on both trips I averaged 50mpg

I dropped a little weight and went a little taller but no real gains granted I only have 8500 miles on these new 70k mile tires but still.

Positives are that I'm happy with the aesthetics over previous setup.

nemo 08-14-2014 08:27 PM

When you say the milage was the same was any correction made for the taller tires?

ksa8907 08-14-2014 08:56 PM

Are you taking into account the odometer under-reporting miles?

2000mc 08-14-2014 09:04 PM

What kind of tires are on the new wheels?

sully06 08-14-2014 11:04 PM

I do the math when I fill up but no the number would be off on my scan gauge. 400 mile trip only adds 4 miles with my new tire size so the difference is minimal.

New tires are Continental PureContact LLR 195/65 15

CapriRacer 08-15-2014 07:09 AM

Doing the math:

The Goodyear Viva 2 has a UTQG rating of 440 A B, while the Continental Pure Contact has a UTQG rating of 700 A A. In all likelihood, the Pure Contact has slightly HIGHER RR due to the treadwear rating and the higher speed rating. The traction value is the same, although one could be at the high end of the range and the other at the low end.

sully06 08-15-2014 09:30 AM

Thinking I should have went with the Michelin defenders

CapriRacer 08-16-2014 01:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sully06 (Post 440264)
Thinking I should have went with the Michelin defenders

Well, the Michelin Defender has a UTQG rating of 820 A B, so the RR could actually be worse than the Continental Pure Contact.

sully06 08-16-2014 09:17 AM

The only reason I say that is because I put those on my ex's car and we did see an increase in mpg

CargoBoatTails 08-16-2014 03:02 PM

IMO the Conti offers a safer ride, I would have chose them too.

sully06 08-16-2014 03:20 PM

Yeah and I really like the tread pattern

matt36415 08-18-2014 07:28 AM

58psi, is that just a little over the max pressure? Dangerous?

aardvarcus 08-18-2014 08:34 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Higher or lower UTQG does not necessarily correlate into rolling resistance, especially across different brands. I have seen it work both ways on different occasions. Way too many variables between tread patterns, tread compounds, psi ranges, actual diameters, etcetera to directly correlate.

Also to clarify the three UTQG ratings are for treadwear, traction, and temperature. The speed rating is part of the service description, which consists of a load index and a speed rating.

For example, compare the following:
Michelin LTX M/S2
Size: P265/75R16
Serv. Desc: 114T
UTQG: 720 A A

Dick Cepek Trail Country
Size: 265/75R16
Serv. Desc: 116T
UTQG: 500 A B

Yes, a bit of an extreme example, but it should be clear from looking at the tread patterns which tire has lower RR, and note that the UTQG doesn’t correlate.

sully06 08-18-2014 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by matt36415 (Post 440840)
58psi, is that just a little over the max pressure? Dangerous?

Well the max is 51 I usually keep them at 55 but put a few psi more for the trip. I had 55 in the Goodyears which had a max of 44 for over a year. I knew the risks of having a blowout were higher but was ok with that.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com