Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-13-2016, 04:15 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,883
Thanks: 23,957
Thanked 7,219 Times in 4,646 Posts
projected frontal area

There is some confusion over the use of the term 'frontal area.'
The proper terminology used by all automotive aerodynamicists is 'projected frontal area.'
All automotive coefficients of aerodynamic drag are based upon a vehicles projected frontal area.
The area is taken by the shadow of the vehicle,cast upon a screen directly behind the vehicle,produced by parallel light,as sunlight.It includes all of the vehicle and has nothing at all to do with the 'front' of the vehicle.The use of this criteria is merely a convention,making all coefficients of aerodynamic drag based upon a common metric.
The shadow may coincide with the vehicles maximum cross-sectional area,but not necessarily,as with the Morelli shape,which has a unconventional side and underfloor camber.
Here's a graphic.

__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
BamZipPow (02-15-2016), NeilBlanchard (02-14-2016), WD40 (02-13-2016)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-13-2016, 05:23 PM   #2 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
"They" could include illustrations that are identical except for the vehicle facing the other way.

Or replace the term "frontal" since it causes confusion amongst laymen. "Projected Aggregate Total Cross-Sectional Area Along The Longitudinal Axis"? But that sure doesn't roll off the tongue.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
aerohead (02-15-2016)
Old 02-14-2016, 09:50 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
As someone who does a lot of drafting for a living, this is essentially what orthographic projection is - and it is called a front view. In architecture, it is called an front elevation.

If the rear wheel track is narrower than the front, then the parts of the rear wheels you can see from looking straight on - are included in the frontal area, as are the front wheels. Ditto for the side view mirrors, and the antenna sticking up on the back of the roof.

__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to NeilBlanchard For This Useful Post:
aerohead (02-15-2016), BamZipPow (02-15-2016)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com