Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-12-2009, 01:36 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: AL
Posts: 2

Max - '94 Nissan Maxima
90 day: 25.5 mpg (US)

Zuki - '05 Suzuki Forenza
90 day: 30.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Window vent visors

I have an 05 Suzuki Forenza that will be my daily driver now. It has vent visors on the windows. Has anyone done any testing to see if they make a measureable difference in fuel economy? Is there any other advantage to them I'm missing?

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-12-2009, 01:38 PM   #2 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,585 Times in 1,553 Posts
Rip em off!

I think the only advantage to using them is opening up the windows while its raining/wet.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2009, 01:50 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: North Central Alabama
Posts: 572

Big Salsa - '04 Toyota Sienna LE

Silver - '10 Toyota Prius III
Thanks: 110
Thanked 123 Times in 71 Posts
I know on my car, and most other cars, that there is separation of air around the a-pillar. They may not be hurting anything. If you do take them off, you should see if you can measure a difference.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2009, 02:17 PM   #4 (permalink)
Hypermiler
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321

PaleCivic (retired) - '96 Honda Civic DX Sedan
90 day: 69.2 mpg (US)

PaleFit - '09 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
Wagons
90 day: 44.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 611
Thanked 433 Times in 283 Posts
On the other hand, the effect might be like this: Aerotesting - Sunroof open vs. closed. - CleanMPG Forums

Tape some strings to your side windows, front and back, and see if / where you have attached and separated airflow.
__________________



11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2009, 02:28 PM   #5 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,513

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 60.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,058
Thanked 6,957 Times in 3,602 Posts


They increase frontal area, so there is likely an adverse effect, even if the flow normally separates/spins into a vortex at the A pillar.

I'd bet they also increase Cd, too.

If you also have them on the rear windows, they're probably also disturbing flow at the outside roof edge / C pillar.

Tuft testing will show you the extent of the disturbed flow. But I'm with Daox: I'd take 'em off!

Will it show up at the fuel pump? I'm guessing the difference is probably smaller than the normal variation you see from tank to tank (but it doesn't mean they're not hurting).
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2009, 02:36 PM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: North Central Alabama
Posts: 572

Big Salsa - '04 Toyota Sienna LE

Silver - '10 Toyota Prius III
Thanks: 110
Thanked 123 Times in 71 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleMelanesian View Post
On the other hand, the effect might be like this: Aerotesting - Sunroof open vs. closed. - CleanMPG Forums

Tape some strings to your side windows, front and back, and see if / where you have attached and separated airflow.
Interesting... I will second the tuft testing idea. We could hypothesize all day about whether or not they make a difference, but the tuft testing should tell you outright.
One thing you could try is only removing it on one side of the car, tufting both sides and seeing the difference in real time.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2009, 02:48 PM   #7 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,513

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 60.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,058
Thanked 6,957 Times in 3,602 Posts
I think we already reasonably know they have to have a negative impact: they increase A at a point where the increase can be of no aero benefit (smooth sides - assuming window shut).
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2009, 02:49 PM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: North Central Alabama
Posts: 572

Big Salsa - '04 Toyota Sienna LE

Silver - '10 Toyota Prius III
Thanks: 110
Thanked 123 Times in 71 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post


They increase frontal area, so there is likely an adverse effect, even if the flow normally separates/spins into a vortex at the A pillar.

I'd bet they also increase Cd, too.

If you also have them on the rear windows, they're probably also disturbing flow at the outside roof edge / C pillar.

Tuft testing will show you the extent of the disturbed flow. But I'm with Daox: I'd take 'em off!

Will it show up at the fuel pump? I'm guessing the difference is probably smaller than the normal variation you see from tank to tank (but it doesn't mean they're not hurting).
I would guess the rear ones (if present) would act more as a parachute based on the picture... so those should come off. The front ones are debatable... it will probably come down to how much use you get out of having them.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2009, 03:02 PM   #9 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,585 Times in 1,553 Posts
I'd have to disagree, I don't think its debatable.

#1) They increase frontal area which inherantly increases drag.

#2) There is no way they don't cause separation. Its an edge hanging out from the car a good inch. Without it, there is at least has a chance for the flow to stay attached.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2009, 03:19 PM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
sepp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: belgium
Posts: 60

the jeep - '02 nissan kingcab
Last 3: 29.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
ive been wondering about this to, but apparently they are only advertised as weather deflectors. and never for any aerodynamic gain, wich they certainly would do if there was any.

but i noticed that all modern trucks have these wind guides to the sides of their cabs, to help keep the airstream attached.



why not place such guides on all the edges of our cars where the airsteam detaches? like above the nose, above the windshield, around the A-beams... would that do any good?

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reviving a 2000 Honda Insight "beater" Red Hybrids 215 08-10-2017 07:35 PM
Window down? JQmile Aerodynamics 1 11-02-2008 11:51 AM
Neat gadget: Solar Auto Vent Daox EcoModding Central 2 10-14-2008 10:28 AM
tuft testing on 93 Sentra back window jim-frank Aerodynamics 5 06-16-2008 04:59 PM
When does having your windows down start to effect your mileage? Chris D. Aerodynamics 9 03-11-2008 12:15 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com