View Single Post
Old 06-25-2013, 06:42 PM   #12 (permalink)
Xist
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,186

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 29.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,225
Thanked 2,217 Times in 1,708 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Mechanic View Post
Green Car Congress: Valeo acquires electric supercharger business from Controlled Power

I wouldn't consider it a unicorn topic considering the potential. I understand few here would agree with that opinion. You need the additional power very rarely as a percentage of total operational time.

regards
Mech
Most "electric superchargers" are useless bilge pumps and computer fans. I had thought that the e-Ram would do [B]something[B], but apparently the thing that is done is negligible. I read on here about the Thomas Knight ones, which have as much shared "DNA" as mermaids and manatees.

There are legitimate and proven implementations, but they seem like a tiny fraction, lost in the junk heap of pretenders.

However, I have a question. That article linked to a previous one, introducing the technology:

Quote:
Compared with a 1.6-liter naturally aspirated engine, the downsized engine with electric supercharger reduces the 70-100 km/h (44-63 mph) top gear acceleration time from 18 to 11 seconds.
Green Car Congress: CPT VTES Electric Supercharger Selected for Two Projects

These cars take 11-18 seconds to accelerate from 44 MPH to 63?
  Reply With Quote