View Single Post
Old 12-29-2017, 04:23 PM   #12 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,467

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,213
Thanked 4,391 Times in 3,365 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedDevil View Post
If it all goes well the lunar buggies are no longer the most remote cars.
Wonder if it could actually drive on Mars? Too cold there, I guess, but other than that?
Interesting thought. Does the M3 have a heating system to maintain battery temperature? I know the Bolt does.

I can think of no reason why it wouldn't function on Mars besides the battery being too cold. Perhaps the motors would eventually overheat due to lack of cooling from the thin atmosphere, but then again they wouldn't have to be pushed very hard, and the temperature is very cold.

That makes me wonder how the Lunar rover rejected heat. It essentially operated in an insulated vacuum. Of the 3 ways to reject heat (Conduction, convection, radiation), only radiation is possible in the vacuum of space.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
RedDevil (12-29-2017)