View Single Post
Old 06-13-2018, 01:36 PM   #2034 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 8,671
Thanks: 11,216
Thanked 4,592 Times in 2,578 Posts
caused by

Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5 View Post
The problem with any incident is that you cannot say it was caused by climate change, or quantify the increase in severity. It may just be weather.

The only way to begin to evaluate the effects of climate change would be to accurately track weather events and perform a net analysis of regions that have seen increases in frequency/severity vs regions that have seen decreases in frequency/severity.

Even that is difficult, because things like increasing wildfires might be due to having more trees than 100 years ago, or from fire prevention keeping lower intensity burns from clearing out debris periodically until it gets to dangerous levels.

I'm not saying there is no problem from GW, only that it's nearly impossible to attribute any particular event to it, and we're prone to confirmation bias if we believe GW is driving these events.
Yeah,the climatologists recommend we not confuse 'weather' for 'climate.'
The Black Swan events do get people's attention.
We have recently experienced meteorological events which are unprecedented in recorded history,like the number of Pacific Basin cyclones/typhoons,and Atlantic hurricanes forming where they've never done it before.
It's an interesting movie.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
NeilBlanchard (06-14-2018)