Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Off-Topic Tech
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-13-2008, 11:30 PM   #1 (permalink)
101% win
 
roflwaffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Where I live
Posts: 1,362

Camryaro - '92 Camry LE V6
90 day: 31.12 mpg (US)

Toy - '82 Pickup
90 day: 24.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 82
Thanked 64 Times in 43 Posts
Bearing wear and low RPM high/load operation.

Looking at most manufacturer's BSFC maps, they tend to go from ~1,000rpm and up at little to full load. If they're testing these engines at WOT/1,000rpm, would it be reasonable to assume that those conditions wouldn't induce significantly more bearing wear?


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2008, 11:48 PM   #2 (permalink)
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
Sounds reasonable to me. As long as the oil film maintains integrity it oughtta work. And why wouldn't it?

Although (and I'm not sure if this applies to newer engines or not) some components are splash lubricated and they could possibly suffer from low rpm/high load ops. I guess I'm thinking of lifters, but lots of the new stuff has roller lifters so maybe it's a non-issue on them.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2008, 03:21 AM   #3 (permalink)
101% win
 
roflwaffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Where I live
Posts: 1,362

Camryaro - '92 Camry LE V6
90 day: 31.12 mpg (US)

Toy - '82 Pickup
90 day: 24.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 82
Thanked 64 Times in 43 Posts
You're right, I almost forgot about OHV engines. I don't think that would be as much of an issue w/ OHC unless oil pressure goes to crap for some reason.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2008, 04:36 AM   #4 (permalink)
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
Since you originally inquired about bearings only, I'd say they'd be fine. Cuz, think of the old Poppin' John Deeres- a really low rpm, high-torque demand situation if there ever was one. And they held up.

As long as there's no lugging or detonating...


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com