Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Off-Topic Tech
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-14-2008, 12:30 AM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
roflwaffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,490

Camryaro - '92 Toyota Camry LE V6
90 day: 31.12 mpg (US)

Red - '00 Honda Insight

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius

3 - '18 Tesla Model 3
90 day: 152.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 349
Thanked 122 Times in 80 Posts
Bearing wear and low RPM high/load operation.

Looking at most manufacturer's BSFC maps, they tend to go from ~1,000rpm and up at little to full load. If they're testing these engines at WOT/1,000rpm, would it be reasonable to assume that those conditions wouldn't induce significantly more bearing wear?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-14-2008, 12:48 AM   #2 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Sounds reasonable to me. As long as the oil film maintains integrity it oughtta work. And why wouldn't it?

Although (and I'm not sure if this applies to newer engines or not) some components are splash lubricated and they could possibly suffer from low rpm/high load ops. I guess I'm thinking of lifters, but lots of the new stuff has roller lifters so maybe it's a non-issue on them.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2008, 04:21 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
roflwaffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,490

Camryaro - '92 Toyota Camry LE V6
90 day: 31.12 mpg (US)

Red - '00 Honda Insight

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius

3 - '18 Tesla Model 3
90 day: 152.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 349
Thanked 122 Times in 80 Posts
You're right, I almost forgot about OHV engines. I don't think that would be as much of an issue w/ OHC unless oil pressure goes to crap for some reason.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2008, 05:36 AM   #4 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Since you originally inquired about bearings only, I'd say they'd be fine. Cuz, think of the old Poppin' John Deeres- a really low rpm, high-torque demand situation if there ever was one. And they held up.

As long as there's no lugging or detonating...

__________________


  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com