Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-01-2011, 08:15 PM   #11 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,268

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,570 Times in 2,834 Posts
How lean can we go before we start to burn valves?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-01-2011, 08:44 PM   #12 (permalink)
35mpg
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Moyock, NC
Posts: 12
Thanks: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Well there's a guy on d-series.org with a del sol that's getting over 70 mpg and his tune is over 22 afr with no ill effect. I figured I was safe at 19 with timing advanced to 45 degrees. So fare I've gotten over 2000 miles on this setup and all is good. (knock on wood)
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2011, 02:17 AM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mwebb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 513

no nickname , it's just a car - '04 volkswagen golf tdi
Thanks: 2
Thanked 101 Times in 74 Posts
lean condition results in cooler combustion temps

Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
How lean can we go before we start to burn valves?
slightly lean is the problem
very lean results in reduced combustion temps

look at a 5 gas graph for nox , nox forms at high combustion temps
look where the peak for nox is .
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2011, 02:21 AM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mwebb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 513

no nickname , it's just a car - '04 volkswagen golf tdi
Thanks: 2
Thanked 101 Times in 74 Posts
velocity should be no more than 300 fps at

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tygen1 View Post
I wouldn't split hairs on exahust pipe size. While I'm sure it could be optimized for FE, I don't expect that to be the need in this case. I have an oversized exhaust pipe as well. I like to use my car for more than just good FE. Even when I go drag racing, I am still getting great FE I want my cake, with frosting and I want to eat it too! Lean Burn is the frosting
the rpm you want to optimize performance at
there is only one correct answer

you get to choose - but a gain at one rpm is going to be a
UN gain at the other end of the spectrum
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2011, 10:49 AM   #15 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,268

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,570 Times in 2,834 Posts
What I have read is 13.2:1 produces the most torque and "highest" EGT's.
But I don't know if that is highest EGTs of all A/F ratios or the highest you get using normal ratios such as 12:1 through 15:1.

I googles searced for quite a while last night and could not find a magic number for the exhaust valve burning air:fuel.
I have burned exhaust valves before I had a car where the IAT sensor was reading 300'F on a normal 70'F day, caused it a nasty lean condition and burned the valves on every cylinder.
Never thought to look for peak NOx to find the highest EGT mixture. I bet that will work.
If I find anything I will post it here. Burning out your exhaust valves to save gas isn't going to save us any money.

An expensive alternative could be to get Sodium core inconel 625 exhaust valves. They are burn proof. I know you can get them for pretty much any chevy V8 gas engine ever made, not sure about getting them for 4 cylinders.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2011, 03:21 PM   #16 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,268

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,570 Times in 2,834 Posts
Computerized Engine Controls - Google Books
What air fuel ratio burns valves?
What air fuel ratio causes the most NOx to form?
Looks like just short of 16:1 is your peak for NOx production and likely the peak for combustion flame temperature.
But once you pass 16:1 NOx levels start to drop quickly. 16.5:1 looks about as NOx-ious as 14.7:1.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2011, 04:11 AM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 553

Little Blue - '98 Ford Escort ZX2 Cool
Team ZX2
90 day: 44.75 mpg (US)

Big Red - '00 Ford Excursion XLT
90 day: 15.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 45 Times in 29 Posts
Oil Pan, we are only use these lean conditions under light loads. In your case, you were accelerating under heavy loads while lean, that's why you burned valves.
At some point, I would like to put a EGT gauge in my car to confirm a drop in combustion tempature.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2011, 08:08 PM   #18 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,268

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,570 Times in 2,834 Posts
Yes my car was running lean all the time.
You can score a new EGT off ebay for cheap like I did. Or get a used one real cheap if you want to get creative.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2011, 01:36 AM   #19 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mwebb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 513

no nickname , it's just a car - '04 volkswagen golf tdi
Thanks: 2
Thanked 101 Times in 74 Posts
retarded ign timing

..."I have burned exhaust valves before I had a car where the IAT sensor was reading 300'F on a normal 70'F day, caused it a nasty lean condition and burned the valves on every cylinder."...

FALSEly hi IAT values will cause
retarded Ignition timing
which will change the timing of Peak Combustion Pressure to
After 14 degrees atdc ...
so part of the charge burns in the exhaust
not in the combustion chamber

contributing to
burnt exhaust valves
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2011, 07:16 AM   #20 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,268

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,570 Times in 2,834 Posts
The car had a mechanical ignition system timing with mechanical and vacuum advances.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Tags
lean burn air fuel ratio





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com