Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hybrids
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-24-2011, 03:03 AM   #1 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 2,877

Svietlana - '05 307 SW
Diesel
90 day: 55.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 668
Thanked 361 Times in 229 Posts
Gas/hybrid buses get lower mileage than diesel

This is from 3 years ago:

Long Beach Transit: Two-Year Evaluation of Gasoline-Electric Hybrid Transit Buses

Long Beach study shows gas/hybrid buses get lower mileage than diesel - AutoBlogGreen

Study Finds Fuel Economy of Gasoline-Electric Hybrid Buses Lower Than That of Conventional Diesel - Green Car Congress

In the meantime, Volvo introduced a diesel/hybrid bus, which is claimed to reduce fuel consumption by up to 30%. Of course, diesel-hybrid technology is more expensive than gas-hybrid or straight diesel, but allows not only lower fuel consumption, but also lower CO2, NOx and soot emissions, which is just as important in an urban environment.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell

Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2011, 05:07 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 3,940

Mica Blue - '05 xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 48.22 mpg (US)

Josepha - '08 xD
90 day: 30.76 mpg (US)
Thanks: 513
Thanked 501 Times in 306 Posts
Are they accounting for the greater energy content of the diesel fuel?

Electric buses with overhead power lines are far more efficient than diesel.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2011, 09:34 AM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 228
Thanks: 0
Thanked 20 Times in 16 Posts
I am surprised they even made gasoline-electric. Really would have guess they were diesle-electric or even CNG-electric.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2011, 11:37 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,651
Thanks: 31
Thanked 237 Times in 171 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piwoslaw View Post
Of course, diesel-hybrid technology is more expensive than gas-hybrid...
Why of course? I'd think it'd be just the opposite: bolt the same hybrid parts to a gas engine or a diesel engine, same cost either way.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2011, 12:00 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 228
Thanks: 0
Thanked 20 Times in 16 Posts
Diesel engines cost more. Still, from a fleet maintenance standpoint, I still would have expected diesel-electric.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2011, 12:35 PM   #6 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,382

Herbie - '86 Golf Diesel
90 day: 51.89 mpg (US)

Steve - '92 Festiva
Thanks: 955
Thanked 324 Times in 273 Posts
Its not that the diesel hybrid parts cost more, just the diesel parts. This, in turn, makes the cumulative costs go up.

It was just an irresponsible way to word it, which makes it seem like the better candidate is unbearably expensive.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2011, 06:03 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
IamIan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 203
Thanks: 122
Thanked 48 Times in 30 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard View Post
Are they accounting for the greater energy content of the diesel fuel?
Yes ... but it changes the results to the opposite of the original poster's title ... in all 3 posted links the Hybrids are more energy efficient ... see bellow:

In this referenced paper it states:

Quote:
On a volumetric basis, the 24-month average fuel economy for the hybrid buses is 3.35 miles per gallon (mpg)—4.3% lower than that of the diesel buses. This difference is likely due to the lower efficiency of a throttled, spark-ignited engine as well as the lower energy content of a gallon of gasoline versus a gallon of diesel. On an equivalent energy per volume basis, the hybrids had an 8.5% mpg increase.
It goes on to compare based on fuel costs ...

Quote:
During the evaluation period, gasoline at LBT cost an average of $2.49 per gallon and diesel cost an average of $2.29 per gallon. This lower fuel economy, combined with a higher fuel cost for gasoline, resulted in fuel costs per mile being $.74 per mile for the hybrids as compared to $.65 per mile for the diesels.
The Diesel fuel was cheaper per gallon by enough of a margin to keep it cheaper to fuel per mile.

But it goes on to also look at the maintenance costs of the two:

Quote:
The hybrids cost $.31 per mile to maintain while the diesels cost $.54 per mile.
Quote:
The hybrids had brake system maintenance costs that were about 90% less than that of the diesel buses with no relines to date on the hybrids.
The diesel fuel per mile saving are not large enough to compensate for the higher costs to maintain them... although the diesels were older buses ... The hybrids were newer ... a better comparison would have been between two groups of hybrid and diesels that were equally old / used.

- - - - - - -

In this has the same findings and states:

Quote:
NREL looked at the performance of the buses and found that the gas hybrids got 4.3 percent lower fuel efficiency than the conventional diesel buses in the fleet. When the lower energy content of gasoline is factored in, though, the gas hybrid came out 8.5 percent better.
- - - - - - - - - -

Also seems to have the same findings:

Quote:
found that on a volumetric basis, the average fuel economy for the gasoline hybrid buses is 3.35 mpg—4.3% lower than that of the conventionally-powered diesel buses
Quote:
On an equivalent energy per volume basis, the hybrids had an 8.5% mpg increase.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to IamIan For This Useful Post:
NeilBlanchard (05-24-2011), UFO (05-24-2011)
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com