Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-27-2011, 03:21 PM   #1 (permalink)
Deadly Efficient
 
Tango Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 1,062

Olivia - '03 Vibe base
90 day: 38.61 mpg (US)

Silver Bullet - '00 Insight
90 day: 60.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 63 Times in 33 Posts
Tuft Testing Smooth Wheel Covers





(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
-Terry





My Pet Threads:
Vibe Mods and What's in a UserName? and YKYAEI

Last edited by Tango Charlie; 03-27-2011 at 04:21 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Tango Charlie For This Useful Post:
BamZipPow (03-27-2011), California98Civic (03-29-2011), Cd (06-24-2011), cfg83 (03-27-2011), Daox (03-28-2011), fusion210 (03-28-2011), KITT222 (03-28-2011), MetroMPG (04-05-2011), MrMiata (04-08-2011), Piwoslaw (03-28-2011), SentraSE-R (03-28-2011)
Old 03-27-2011, 08:32 PM   #2 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,724

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 43.05 mpg (US)
Thanks: 385
Thanked 459 Times in 315 Posts
Tango Charlie -

Great work! But I can't tell any difference.

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2011, 09:37 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 3,940

Mica Blue - '05 xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 48.22 mpg (US)

Josepha - '08 xD
90 day: 30.76 mpg (US)
Thanks: 513
Thanked 501 Times in 306 Posts
Yeah, and it might even seem that the smooth cover is slightly worse? Maybe some partial skirts that fill the leading and top gap are in order? And/Or, a few tanks to see how the FE does?
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2011, 09:41 PM   #4 (permalink)
Cause I'm an 80's Baby!!
 
festivaWES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Strafford, MO
Posts: 37

Festiva hauler - '02 S-10
90 day: 27.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i think the air coming front the front fender flare plastic is foiling your tuft testings...
__________________
In search of the ideal gas mizer.....METRO
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2011, 11:22 PM   #5 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,352

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 32.19 mpg (US)

Goldie Locks - '011 Cruze LTZ
90 day: 29.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 330 Times in 249 Posts
...and, you could simultaneously do your A-B-A tests by having one side have the stock plastic wheel covers and the other side have the smooth, pizza pan cover...that way, you're basically performing BOTH tests under identical (albeit RIGHT & LEFT sided) conditions on the same road, at the same time. Just have the "chase car" move from side to side.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2011, 12:57 AM   #6 (permalink)
Ecomodder en route
 
KITT222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South of the Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 190

Vib - '04 Vibe base
Thanks: 10
Thanked 9 Times in 7 Posts
The stock fender flares might be messing it up a bit. Or they are pushing air away from the front wheel. You might see a bigger difference in the rear wheels.


And tele_man, Tango has the alloy wheels, so there is no stock plastic wheels covers.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2011, 05:09 AM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Dilatant
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 262

Volvo - '00 V70 XC AWD SE
90 day: 27.7 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 24 Times in 16 Posts
Hmm. A lot of reasons posted as to why the smooth wheel covers here aren't really worse than the alloys for smoothing airflow, despite the clear visual indication that they are. On this car the smooth wheel covers clearly disturb the airflow more than the alloys.

The car is the car, and the tufts are the tufts. If the car has slightly flared fenders then those are the conditions of the test. Many cars have those. I find this interesting because it shows that smoothing airflow along a vehicle isn't as easy as it appears it would be - even the most accepted of mods may result in a loss and not a win.

Are the alloys a "fan blade" type that might be sucking air into the wheel? That could be a factor in why the airflow downstream of the alloy wheel is less disturbed.

Last edited by instarx; 03-28-2011 at 05:22 AM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to instarx For This Useful Post:
California98Civic (03-29-2011)
Old 03-28-2011, 08:48 AM   #8 (permalink)
Musician w/ Light Wallet
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Midwest
Posts: 47

SeaBiscuit - '98 Civic DX Hatch
Team Honda
90 day: 39.99 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
I think I see more tuft movement in the 2nd video.

Isn't it possible that more air on the outside (moving the tufts) means that less air is getting trapped inside the wheel well?

JMac
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2011, 09:26 AM   #9 (permalink)
Deadly Efficient
 
Tango Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 1,062

Olivia - '03 Vibe base
90 day: 38.61 mpg (US)

Silver Bullet - '00 Insight
90 day: 60.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 63 Times in 33 Posts
I was also like, and and

I did notice, though, that with the disc installed, the tufts around the perimeter of the wheel well in the nine o'clock to two o'clock positions, were more stable. So JMac, I think you may be on to something.

OTM, I like your idea of doing both sides at once. Wish I woulda thought of it, but it took a fair amount of arm twisting to get the wife to drive with me as it was.
__________________
-Terry





My Pet Threads:
Vibe Mods and What's in a UserName? and YKYAEI
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2011, 11:22 AM   #10 (permalink)
Pishtaco
 
SentraSE-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,278

Clean Green Toaster Machine - '06 xB
90 day: 45.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 193 Times in 127 Posts
I agree that the second video shows more movement of the tufts. Thanks for a very interesting test.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
Darrell

Boycotting Exxon since 1989, BP since 2010
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? George Carlin
Mean Green Toaster Machine
49.4 mpg avg over 30,375 miles. 176% of '08 EPA
Best flat drive 94.5 mpg for 10.1 mi
Longest tank 1033 km (642 mi) on 10.56 gal = 60.8 mpg
Clean Green Toaster Machine
45.8 mpg over 2235 miles, 164% of '08 EPA
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com