View Single Post
Old 05-11-2009, 07:31 PM   #52 (permalink)
ConnClark
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 231 Times in 160 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CapriRacer View Post
The problem with arguing rubber "hardness" and trying to relate it to rolling resistance is that tread rubber compounds have a three dimensional relationship between rolling resistance, tread wear, and traction - and unfortunately "hardness" is only 2 dimensions.

So you can have a "hard" compound that has high rolling resistance, poor traction, but good treadwear and a "soft" compound that has high rolling resistance, good traction, and poor treadwear.

In other words, you can't relate hardness to rolling resistance.

(And BTW, you can't relate rolling resistance to traction or grip either)
Apparently you haven't been following the discussion.

more info based on solid tires

http://www.rehab.research.va.gov/jou...kauzlarich.pdf
__________________
  Reply With Quote