View Single Post
Old 05-18-2009, 12:54 PM   #29 (permalink)
jamesqf
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bicycle Bob View Post
Overall, I think that reducing the need for long commutes and freight routes is the way to go...
True, especially for the commuting. My 186,000 mps telecommute beats your 47 minutes :-) The problem with the rail system comes at the other end. When I leave my house (which itself is not where there's what anyone would call a lot of traffic), it's often to go to someplace like a lake or trailhead that might not get visited by more than a few people a week. Hardly economic to build rail there.

As you get less & less need for people to physically commute to job locations, though there'll be an overall decrease in traffic volume, a larger share of what remains will be trips with one or both ends at less-dense locations.
  Reply With Quote