View Single Post
Old 05-25-2009, 12:37 PM   #12 (permalink)
superchow
Master of 140 hamsters
 
superchow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 183

Hamster - '07 Honda Civic EX
90 day: 29.41 mpg (US)

Whooshy Wagon - '04 Volvo V40
90 day: 23.33 mpg (US)

Minotaur - '09 Ford Taurus X SEL
90 day: 19.05 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
If the speed was down below 35, then I'd bump start in 5th, shift into 4th and accelerate back above 35. Then back to 5th gear all the way to 55.

Here's a graph I found on Temple of VTEC Asia in the i-VTEC implementation on the K20A engine. Yes, it has a DOHC vs SOHC layout, and 2.0 liters vs 1.8 in our cars, but I believe the general implementation of the different "phases" are similar. (The torque graph is uncannily similar...)



Here the link to the whole article: Honda's K20A Engine

Most interesting to me was the probable fact that low revs/high load (zone "3" on the graph) in this car is counterproductive. I'm estimating the switchover from "Low cam" to "High-speed cam" at about 3500 rpm. So, in conclusion: Loads from 15-20% to 50-55% and revs from 1500-2000 rpm to 3000 rpm should keep the engine in the "lean-burn" range, zone "1". (Idling will also keep the engine in lean burn, which may be worth an experiment in the future comparing different driving methods.)
__________________
  Reply With Quote