View Single Post
Old 05-27-2009, 10:04 AM   #57 (permalink)
PoloGuy
EcoModding Lurker
 
PoloGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CapriRacer View Post
Unfortunately, I have been and I wanted to make sure eveyone avoided the trap of 2 dimensional thinking - especially the misconception that hardness and rolling resistance were somehow related, similar to the way it is commonly misunderstood that hardness and traction are also related.

This technology triangle is one of the design compromises that tire engineers have to face, especially when designing tires for the OE market. Vehicle manufacturers are keenly aware that tires have rolling resistance and that using low RR tires can not only improve a vehicle's EPA fuel economy ratings (a selling point), but also provide some relief in the development of a vehicle when the vehicle engineers have difficulty meeting their objectives, such as weight, energy consumption, etc.

The problem is that extremely low RR tires tires also don't have great traction and / or wear life. This is one of the reasons one hears lots of complaints about these properties on tires supplied to new vehicles. It is commonly thought the cost is what is driving this, but that is not the case. It's this technology triangle.

But tires designed for the replacement market are less subject to pressure of fuel economy. Most consumers feel that tires are supposed to deliver good wear characteristics - with traction and rolling resistance being very far down the list of desireables. As a result, most replacement market tires do not have good RR properties - and if there is a compromise to be made, it is between wear and traction - which fuels the misconception of hardness vs traction.

So just a word of caution.
First of all, thanks for the great posts! You and Ernie Rogers have gone above and beyond!

You keep bringing up this point and it is a very important one. When thinking about tires it is very easy, and convenient, to think in two dimensions. But tire engineers and rubber chemists must work with at least three dimensions. The hardness of the tread rubber compound, for example, is usually not taken into consideration when thinking about wear, traction and rolling resistance. Hardness is but one parameter that taken by itself has little relevance to this discussion. More relevant are the tread rubber composition and the tire construction.
  Reply With Quote