View Single Post
Old 06-10-2009, 10:00 PM   #2 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
FWIW, I don't think that strategy will do as much good on a wagonback as it does on the Pinto hatchback (Edit: and Beetle). My reasoning is, if the Pinto spoiler really does work and promote attached airflow all down the hatch, it would successfully have reduced the wake area at the rear of the car by a large amount... half? But on your wagon you have proposed extending the spoiler up to such an extent that even if you do achieve attached airflow on the top of the back window (or the mimicry thereof) it looks like it wouldn't reduce the area that forms a turbulent wake very much. Now if that spoiler went horizontally out the back for, say, 3', you might have something.

Last edited by Frank Lee; 06-11-2009 at 03:26 AM..
  Reply With Quote