Quote:
Originally Posted by stevey_frac
This is wrong though. They tested the kits. The kits provably don't work.
But hydrogen fuel enrichment that enables a lean burn engine to run very lean at low loads is more efficient. Provably so. The kits just don't have the sophistication to lean out the AFR. To do it properly, you'd have to add a wideband O2 sensor, and trick the ECU into running quite lean if the load was low.
Better yet would be to have a wideband, and an ECU with lean cruise built in.
Need proof? Check out this study:
ScienceDirect - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy : Hydrogen enrichment for improved lean flame stability
(i hope that link works)
Alternatively, do a google search for hydrogen fuel enrichment. |
Well if you think you've invented a magical free source of hydrogen that doesn't require any energy, I'm sure we would all love to heard about it. Until you do, any benefit gained from the hydrogen will be more than made up for by the additional alternator load. Sorry buddy but there is no free lunch here. Please check your spelling.
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevey_frac
The same thing happens when you hit the gas peddle on you car with respect to air. There is no magic device that allows the air in the intake manifold to suddenly jump from 5 psi to 14psi (MAP reading). As a result, the AFR dosent' perfectly track at 14.7:1. It wanders. Richens up when you punch the peddle, leans out when you suddenly let off. That's fairly normal, and the same would be acceptable in a hydrogen system.
|
You need to read up on EFI or better yet build an EFI system before you start saying things like this. You have no idea what you're talking about.