Quote:
Originally Posted by theunchosen
I disagree on the AFR. Honda, Toyota, Ford, GM and others have all built mule engines that can do better than 35:1. Not only that they can do it without suffering diminishing returns.
|
There's a tremendous difference between building unique/one-off/prototype/mule engines for research and attempting to replicate the results on an engine with stock architecture. Unless you are completely redesigning and fabricating new pistons, chambers, valve location/angles, injector location, spark plug location, etc., you cannot make such a comparison. Adding heat sinks to pistons doesn't count as an architecture change.
BTW, why is this in "Success Stories" when the main result so far is an engine meltdown?