View Single Post
Old 07-25-2009, 03:48 PM   #57 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,268
Thanks: 24,393
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
exhaust into wake

Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ View Post
You could, but I wonder if it would be as conclusive as real world testing? and You'd have to perform several sets of calculations.

1. Engine speed increases as vehicle speed does, until a gear change
2. Exhaust CFM/airflow changes with pedal modulation... (think: turbocharger)
3. Air mass over/around the vehicle obviously changes with vehicle speed, not to mention every time the wind blows...

There are too many variables, IMO, to answer a question like this with mathematics alone. At least not for someone like me, who isn't interested in sitting around crunching numbers to attempt to cover every possible variable/scenario. Someone else can take that liberty. LOL.

Real world testing may be in order, but most probably on a track. (Unless someone plans some serious vehicle modifications). But even modifying the vehicle to put the exhaust in the rear end's low pressure area would breed questions such as "would it help more at the top of the area or the bottom? either side?" etc and so on.

Speculatively, I can say that adding ANY amount of pressure to a low-pressure or vacuum area would reduce the amount of vacuum (increase overall pressure) and SHOULD help, even if marginally.

Less speculatively, I would wonder if the necessary modification would prove it's worth for the return on investment over a viable period of time.

Also, a question... if the exhaust were in the wake area, would that not create a vacuum and aid the scavenging cycle in the exhaust, since the area the exhaust is exiting into would obviously be a vacuum... thus "Drawing" the gasses out of the pipe.

It might be beneficial to performance in more than one way. Speculatively.
ConnClark was noodling around with this one.Here's my take on it.For a wagon,SUV,or van type vehicle,it probably makes no difference where the exhaust is.The reason being that essentially,the constant-section body prevents any static-regain of the surrounding flow,and when the flow finally separates at the rear,the base pressure behind these types of vehicles is at the same pressure as anywhere along the side of the body,up to the windshield.So moving the exhaust from the side to rear of one of these types of vehicles would have no effect with respect to scavenging.-------------------- With respect to a fastback-style car,with attached flow all the way to the rear,it would make a difference.On a fast-back,from anywhere on the body,say from the headrest back,pressure would be steadily increasing as the flow moved closer to the tail.So actually,for a fast- back,a side exhaust would potentially provide the highest scavenging,as the pressure behind the tail would be at a higher base pressure,respecting the Bernoulli Theorem of delta-V vs delta-P.
  Reply With Quote