View Single Post
Old 08-25-2009, 08:20 PM   #66 (permalink)
Christ
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Of course, I was assuming that all suspension parts are at OEM spec there. It's too difficult to accurately say what happens when things get worn, because no two worn parts will perform exactly the same, so it becomes a matter of speculation as to exactly what's going to happen in that case.

If you refer to physics, there is a motive force rotating the tires, but friction is attempting to stop that motion (equal and opposite blah blah blah). Under cruise conditions, the front tires (ideally) should be at 0 toe for less friction during cruising, and less power/fuel consumption. In order to achieve this, slack has to be "built in" to the suspension system (see: rubber bushings) so that the road surfaces frictional stress on the tires approximates a 0 toe angle. IIRC, most OEM settings call for toe IN to compensate for this, and adding stiffer/solid suspension bushings means you have to compensate for the lack of motive capability of the suspension now, so you should be closer to 0 toe from the get-go.

Is this incorrect? It's how I've always understood, but I'm not a suspension engineer by any means.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote