View Single Post
Old 08-30-2009, 03:18 AM   #6 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Good find- yes, it's a fun one.

Validation of worn-out tire reduced r.r.! They say 20% reduction.

It appears the good stuff starts on pg 122.

Hysteresis is the biggie for losses. Deep treads = more hysteresis.

Tread wear ratings don't translate into miles of life. Tires with lower tread wear ratings have shallower treads, which equals lower r.r.

However, tires with deep treads, when worn to the shallower depth, can be said to have the same r.r.
__________________


  Reply With Quote