View Single Post
Old 09-02-2009, 01:03 AM   #3 (permalink)
Concrete
Sequential
 
Concrete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kansas
Posts: 177

The Truck - '00 Chevy S10 Extended Cab
90 day: 22.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 22 Times in 7 Posts
I got a question - or two

Since tire design appears to be a trade between traction, wear and rolling resistance
why is the customer only given two of the critical components to chose tires?
Would Bridgestone have any plans to list rolling resistance?
I personally could find myself loyal to a manufacture that supplied all the data, instead of having to dig thru incomplete third party data & trying to guess what tire is lower RR.

Also
Does Bridgestone have plans for any higher pressures passenger tires?
once again I would be interested in becoming a customer of such a company.

Besides a look around your local store parking lot will show many tires designed to be in the 32-35 psi range - are living a life of dangerous under-inflation.
there is not much room when you are in the low thirties before you are building up heat in a tire and getting a blow out, or wallowing the bead off the rim. I seems like the tire makers would be pushing another 5 or 10 more psi for for safety - as well as being eco-friendly & saving gas.

best wishes on the interview

edit:
crap!
well I guess this is tomorrow

So how did the interview go?
__________________
Concrete
Start where you are - Use what you have - Do what you can.

Last edited by Concrete; 09-02-2009 at 01:04 AM.. Reason: space time malfunction
  Reply With Quote