View Single Post
Old 09-08-2009, 07:00 AM   #18 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MechEngVT View Post
Calipers have no mechanism to spread the pads away from the disc after brake actuation. Many caliper designs have o-rings on the slides in an attempt to prevent knock-back where rotation and flexing of the disc (or wheel bearing) will push the pads away from the disc.
I'd say the retraction accomplished via the deformation of the square-profile piston seals qualifies as a "mechanism". Yes in the past it wasn't much of a retraction but lately I've seen tidbits about lower-drag calipers on the new "high fuel economy" versions of domestic pickups. Are they really any better than what was standard, oh, 15 years ago? Here's a bit of info on what makes for a lower drag disc system: Classroom manual for automotive ... - Google Books

I've never run anything (car/truck/motorcycle/tractor/off-road toy) hard enough to experience "knock back". I would hope that's just a racing thing. I suppose those anti-knock back O-rings function the same way as the caliper piston seals?
__________________


  Reply With Quote