View Single Post
Old 09-11-2009, 03:00 AM   #12 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
What's an MR drivetrain?

I didn't know Luminas and whatnot were available with m/t?

The FWD rationale is, the donor '59 has completely shot floors, trans, rear axle, etc.

The "other donor" '89 Le Sabre has good engine/trans/floors/etc. Drives like a dream, has astonishing power, and gets good fe.

Throw away that Chev X-frame (which I'm not all that fond of anyway as it makes servicing u-joints a rare treat. And, should lose a nice chunk of weight in the process) make sure the custom rockers are stout, stretch the Buick pan 11" (probably somewhere behind the driver's seat) and voila- unibody fwd '59 complete with cushy ride, good roll bars, good brakes, and air-ride suspension. Also the Chev driveshaft tunnel really puts a cramp on the interior- it would be grand to be rid of it. Heh heh flat floor could lead to lower seats could lead to top chop! Weight bias = probably not a whole lot different than the Buick. Total weight probably not a whole lot different either.
__________________



Last edited by Frank Lee; 09-11-2009 at 03:39 AM.. Reason: spelling. yah! ME! i know!
  Reply With Quote