View Single Post
Old 09-28-2009, 05:59 PM   #5 (permalink)
NeilBlanchard
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
Hi,

Quote:
Originally Posted by Piwoslaw View Post
First things that come to mind:
1) More rotational mass than air.
2) Less comfort.
3) Pain to change tires.
4) After time and many large temperature swings, foam may start to crumble.
1) Yes, that's true, but I think it would be maybe a pound or less?

2) Again, true, but (eventually) the spring rates and dampening could be adjusted to compensate.

3) Yes, but if the rolling resistance could be cut to a fraction of what it is using air pressure, then you probably would save a lot of fuel, and it be worth it. Besides, I am thinking of this as an experiment.

4) Right -- that is why I was wondering about what kinds of foam that would be less likely to NOT break down. I know that foam used in stress skin structural panels on buildings are amazingly strong and rigid. A rigid tire would not heat up very much -- and it would roll very, very well, I think!

As for the TWEEL -- it is designed to replace standard tires and to have the same kind of flexing. Which is exactly what I'm trying to eliminate.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote