10-14-2009, 02:59 AM
|
#74 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Quote:
FrankLee (Today 12:43 AM)
:Edward A. Sanchez (10/12/09 01:03 PM)
@ Onebulldogs. In a perfect world, perhaps. However, K&N is one of the few facilities in Southern California that has a four-wheel dyno, which is required when testing all-wheel-drive vehicles. So even though on the surface it may seem like favoritism or impropriety, it's more often than not a matter of necessity.
:Four-wheel dyno. Right. Look at the picture and tell us where the front wheels are.
|
Quote:
FrankLee (Today 12:59 AM)
Another thing I'm going to point out is the glaring discrepency between the dyno chart LINES and the dyno chart NUMBERS. The numbers for HP and Torque for "with K&N" have been inflated by 10 each, and the erroneous numbers were used in the calculations- for whatever they are worth, as every number in this piece is suspect. I'm actually surprised Mr. Williams... er, I mean, "By the author" didn't photoshop in his own new dyno lines- but that might have taken some effort.
|
...just in case it gets deleted there...
Last edited by Frank Lee; 10-14-2009 at 03:08 AM..
|
|
|