View Single Post
Old 10-19-2009, 03:48 AM   #19 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,556 Times in 2,218 Posts
Both layouts place the ball in line with the rod. The balls-n-sockets on both layouts see the same strain; it is the bolt or stud that has to deal with "leverage".

If you are placing the ball closer to the knuckle, you are changing the geometry. And, you are not putting a nut up there to hold the bolt like you said. Or, you are putting a nut between the knuckle and the joint, keeping the geometry and subjecting the bolt to the same "leverage" as a tie rod end stud, but basically making a neo-tie rod end from what I can tell.
__________________


  Reply With Quote