View Single Post
Old 10-23-2009, 11:50 PM   #82 (permalink)
Christ
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by robertwb70 View Post
When they say stuff like this "I wonder how long it took them to spray that clay on" it's obvious they didn't watch it...

And there are other examples in posts here but you get the idea, sometimes you CAN tell.
So you're contextualizing that post based on something you still don't know, right?

I mean, you're assuming he didn't go get a drink during the part where they explained how the clay was applied.

Frankly, not everyone really cares about TV all that much, and chances are, several of the people commenting who you feel "didn't watch it", probably did, and just missed the bits and pieces you're going to focus on for proof.

Carry on, please.

Regardless of whether someone watched it or not, or whether the outcome could have been different, the tests are completely invalid. It's one of their worst works to date. There are entirely too many variables, and that just ruins it.

Guess what could account for 11% change in fuel economy? CROSS WINDS.

Oh, we never got any of that data, did we?
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote