View Single Post
Old 10-28-2009, 12:33 PM   #41 (permalink)
doviatt
Master EcoModder
 
doviatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 388

Grey Goose (Retired) - '89 Geo Metro LSI 4 door hatch back
Last 3: 57.16 mpg (US)

Tweety - '91 Geo Metro Convertible -2 Door convertible LSI
Team Metro
90 day: 43.97 mpg (US)

Shadow - '02 Honda Shadow VT1100
90 day: 43.46 mpg (US)

Sonic - '07 Honda CBR1000RR
90 day: 42.69 mpg (US)

Filmore - '84 Volkswagen Vanagon
90 day: 20.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 47
Thanked 44 Times in 31 Posts
I live in Utah,

The place where they did the increase in limit is a very remote area between nothing and nothing (I haven't been down there in a while though). Long and pretty much straight with not much traffic let alone any congestion. Any curves do scare you into slowing down if you aren't paying attention.

Utah doesn't care much about the environment. We want to store the worlds nuclear waste here also (I don't), greedy *******s. We added a HOV lane a while ago and then never advertised it. They never told or taught people to carpool to take advantage of it. So when it went mostly unused people complained and they turned it into a toll lane. Pay up and you can now speed in this lane also with no tolerance of law abiding car pool users. The financial benefit of taking this toll overshadowed the desire to conserve and promote carpools. I car pool every day but I don't use the HOV lane. The standard congestion usually matches my 45-55 speed I maintain in the RIGHT (SLOW) lane.

after re-reading the original post it does appear to only refer to the remote locations only. There is no way they could supply a real engineered study to justify this in metro areas. $$$ speak loudly though.


Last edited by doviatt; 10-28-2009 at 12:47 PM.. Reason: more info...
  Reply With Quote