View Single Post
Old 10-31-2009, 07:49 AM   #17 (permalink)
NeilBlanchard
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
Hi,

If the wheel covers only had to move for turns above say 25% of the steering lock, then for normal driving the cover would not need to move from flush. It would move for tighter turns, which usually happen at lower speeds anyway. Also, since it is fixed only to the steering motion (and not the suspension) this would keep it from adding to the unsprung weight.

There is an aerodynamic advantage to having as little air space as possible around the tires -- but having that sort of a snug-fitting fender is a slightly different issue from this kind of pivoting cover. Because unless if you limited the vertical travel of the tire, then a snug-fitting "inner fender" would have to move with the suspension and with the steering, and this would add to the unsprung weight and to the complexity of the design.

So, it depends on how many aspects of the aerodynamics you want/need to address.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote