View Single Post
Old 11-05-2009, 03:29 PM   #19 (permalink)
Christ
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by j.reed View Post
I was about to say that...cats are designed to recduce CO, NOx, and unburnt fuel. Not co2... And yes a good quality performance cat will flow more than your engine, so there really is no gain to be had. I do not believe in the whole global warming(as a way of life, not the theory) but i DO believe in cleaning up the air. If youve ever driven a car without a cat, youll want one back. It stinks and gives you a headache even with the windows up
I haven't had that experience personally, but I do also keep my vehicles tuned to run within emissions limits regardless of their purpose (race cars don't get cats, but I do drive them to the track, as I keep them in street legal classes.)

I can get the cars smogged by a friend of a friend for $20 after hours, but there are no emissions testing procedures around here that I need to pass, including (in some cases) visual inspections.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote