Fuel Economy, Hypermiling, EcoModding News and Forum - EcoModder.com - View Single Post - Myth Busters SUCKS! (HHO mod, does it work?)

aerohead · 11-14-2009, 04:27 PM

Okay,read all the posts.
It appears that the science for hydrogen enhanced combustion is good.
It appears that even on-board hydrogen production using the alternator is okay.
The hydrogen accomplishes what Larry Widmer's high-swirl, Smokey Yunick's "expander-homogenizer" cycle processes,or HONDA's VTEC-E technology accomplishes,which allows more complete combustion of the charge during a point when the piston can make best use of it,with "lean-burn" a symptom of or CONSEQUENCE , and not a premise for the technology.
I would like to know how much is used and how/where it it is introduced to the intake tract.
The hydrogen is mentioned in the body of the literature all the time,with only one mention of,and use of the free oxygen.Anybody want to speak to that?

11-14-2009, 04:27 PM	#235 (permalink)
aerohead Master EcoModder Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A. Posts: 16,320 Thanks: 24,442 Thanked 7,387 Times in 4,784 Posts	caught up Okay,read all the posts. It appears that the science for hydrogen enhanced combustion is good. It appears that even on-board hydrogen production using the alternator is okay. The hydrogen accomplishes what Larry Widmer's high-swirl, Smokey Yunick's "expander-homogenizer" cycle processes,or HONDA's VTEC-E technology accomplishes,which allows more complete combustion of the charge during a point when the piston can make best use of it,with "lean-burn" a symptom of or CONSEQUENCE , and not a premise for the technology. I would like to know how much is used and how/where it it is introduced to the intake tract. The hydrogen is mentioned in the body of the literature all the time,with only one mention of,and use of the free oxygen.Anybody want to speak to that?