Thread: NarrowerTires?
View Single Post
Old 11-27-2009, 06:47 AM   #14 (permalink)
CapriRacer
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 794
Thanks: 4
Thanked 388 Times in 237 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swiftbow View Post
Interesting Capri. How is a load indices calculation performed? ........
Load Index is a quick, and easy way to express load carrying capacity.

There are several formulae for calculating the load carrying of a tire, but they are complex - and of course, it varies accoprding to inflation pressure. Usually load carrying capacity is published in the form of a table.

I explain that in more detail here:

Barry's Tire Tech

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swiftbow View Post
......The focus is a fairly light car so I was surprised that this tire wouldn't have the load capacity.........
I explain that also in the link, but the short version is "Over-design / Under-utilize" - meaning you should use tires (and other products) at less than their maximum capacity - and the further away from the maximum you are, the safer it is.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swiftbow View Post
.....I'm also surprised that even with the tire filled to max it would give deformity degrading FE. 195 to 155 width is a substantial amount where deformation of that magnitude is surprising. BUT I really don't want to compromise safety, especially in a situation where I could harm someone else in what in the scheme of things ... is just a simple test.

...........

Doug
The rolling resistance of a tire is directly proportional to its deflection, so ANY deflection has a consequence on fuel economy. And changing tire sizes changes the deflection. When it comes to fuel economy, going a smaller tire is the wrong direction. Larger tires (meaning larger load carrying capacity) have lower RR for a given load. However, this effect is pretty small and huge improvements should not be expected.

Last edited by CapriRacer; 11-27-2009 at 07:13 AM..
  Reply With Quote