View Single Post
Old 11-27-2009, 08:00 PM   #27 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Back when I wanted to do a trike conversion to my Tempo in the worst way I came across the math and calced it out. Projected r.r. reduction was so small as to be almost pointless.

My project would have lost maybe up to 80 lbs from the deleted wheel/suspension- which doesn't do much- and the r.r. like Bob says has more to do with load. I'd expect some gain from elimination of scrub on one end but absent any testing of that theory, my sources say that factor is very negligible too.

I wasn't going to mess with trying to taper the body. For one thing it would be difficult to achieve a nice curve inwards in plan view. For another I have my doubts about the effectiveness of extreme boattailing in plan view in the real world due to... get ready... the dreaded CROSSWINDS.

__________________


  Reply With Quote