View Single Post
Old 11-28-2009, 01:19 PM   #11 (permalink)
dcb
needs more cowbell
 
dcb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ÿ
Posts: 5,038

pimp mobile - '81 suzuki gs 250 t
90 day: 96.29 mpg (US)

schnitzel - '01 Volkswagen Golf TDI
90 day: 53.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 158
Thanked 269 Times in 212 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by winkosmosis View Post
It's not like turbo charging doesn't also draw amps. It's a myth that a turbo scavenges free energy. Adding more backpressure with a turbine causes the piston to have a harder time moving up.
There is also additional pressure pushing down on the pistons on intake, and you have to consider the temperature drop across the turbine as well as the pressure drop when considering the energy recovered by a turbo.

Considering the fact that you can get the same power out of a smaller engine, yes, it is more efficient. If you reclaim exhaust energy to pack more fuel/air into an existing engine then it probably is NOT going to be more efficient.

But there is energy to reclaim in the exhaust and a turbine is a contemporary method of reclaiming it, as in the exhaust powered alternator, or the turbo compound engine
Controlled Power Technologies... TIGERS

__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
  Reply With Quote