View Single Post
Old 11-29-2009, 04:45 PM   #7 (permalink)
bombloader
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: boise id
Posts: 64

The XT - '92 Yamaha XT225 Serow
Last 3: 80.67 mpg (US)

White Civic - '08 Honda Civic Hybrid
90 day: 38.23 mpg (US)

Blue and White Beast - '78 Ford F150
90 day: 11.33 mpg (US)

Red T100 - '93 Toyota T100
90 day: 14.7 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by thatguitarguy View Post
I've heard arguments both ways, but the last time I had a car with 13s was an 80s Subaru, and I ran 185s on it, but it was also a 4x4 and heavier.

Saving a few buck here and there isn't worth standing out in the cold.
The reason that narrow is usually better is because you want to concentrate pressure to break thru ice and packed snow. Think what chains and studs both do-concentrate the cars weight on a on very small points. Also, if you've ever mountain climbed, think crampons. Wide tires, ceterus paribus. do the opposite. I'd focus on getting good quality snow tires in a similar size to what you have. If you want to improve handling on dry roads, wide tires are a good idea.
  Reply With Quote