Quote:
Originally Posted by Winfield1990
I personally dont think hydrogen is a good choice for vehicles , blah blah blah.. if you do happen to get more energy out than in if your storing it as a gas.
You have to keep compression high , and the only way I can think of keeping pressure of the gas high enough to use it because when the tanks pressure drops you still have a bit of hydrogen left but your screwed with being able to use it.
tank with a solenoid piston on the inside to compress the gas when the pressure drops allowing you to get the most out of the tank.
about making the gas onhand when you need it and not storing it .... I have no input on that goodluck hopefully it works. I wasnt going to go through 30 something pages right now before saying my input.
goodluck
|
Ok, this is even starting to drive me nuts. I'm going to throw a shoe right now.
Ok. Maybe if I type it, someone will actually read it and understand - OVERUNITY IS NOT POSSIBLE. You will never get more out of anything than what you've put into it, which means that the fuel value of stored electrolyzed hydrogen is not going to be more than the value of energy put into the electrolysis process.
The whole point of this discussion, in Nerys' point of view, is whether or not hydrogen itself will make a worthwhile (in dollar amount) addition to his combustion process. Period.
Can we stop thinking about whether or not there is a possibility of overunity now, please?
I think, for all intents and purposes, nobody who has posted here has or is able to do the proper math to determine under all circumstances whether or not H2 will aide in the combustion process sufficient to actually do anything. I guess it's time to stop talking about it, and just TRY IT OUT.
Have a nice day,
Christ