View Single Post
Old 12-06-2009, 10:02 AM   #34 (permalink)
NeilBlanchard
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
The thing that is so amazing about the EV1 is that it had so many good qualities -- it was the FIRST time that GM had designed an electric car! Imagine how good it could have been if they had been refining it, and learning as they went?

I think it was this potential that scared the rest of GM and the oil companies. In a way it was analogous with a small branch of Intel building the first Athlon (instead of AMD) -- it blew by the Pentium II in clockspeed and performance!

The issue about the weight etc. (the EV1 was 2,900 pounds including the 1,100 pound battery), still apply today -- to the Volt! At ~3,500 pounds it will not be a very good electric car. I think that GM is still unable to make up it's mind about "letting" another technology succeed. So, I think they are consciously (or unconsciously?) ham-stringing the Volt so they can make claims on both sides of the argument.

If it succeeds, then they can say "See what we did!" and if it fails, then they can say "See, we told you so!" I think the EV1 was an overall big success (despite the flaws), so they had to kill it to save the rest of their company.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to NeilBlanchard For This Useful Post:
orange4boy (12-06-2009), pgfpro (12-07-2009)