View Single Post
Old 03-17-2008, 12:27 AM   #17 (permalink)
s2man
I"m not lurking!
 
s2man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 128

Porthos - '96 Chevrolet Cavalier
90 day: 31.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
[QUOTE=MetroMPG;14524]Remember - a BSFC chart shows fuel consumption of a significantly LOADED engine.[/IMG]

I'm gonna have to disagree there. The Y axis on a BSFC map shows the load, in torque or engine pressure, from 0 to max for each rpm on the X axis. Though the max torque is at WOT, those low-torque consumption values must be measured at lower loads to create the entire map.
********
I've just spent a geeky afternoon looking at every BSFC map I can find online. After isolating the maps for gasoline engines, I've got a few observations:

A - The peak efficiency islands, measured at the top, bottom, left and right extremes vary from 50 to 90% of peak torque for that rpm. The center point of the islands ranges from 62 to 79% of peak torque for that rpm, with an average of 72%.

B - Though peak efficiency islands' load is within a narrow band, their rpm width varies greatly between engines.

C - BSFC goes way up at low loads.

D - In general, the BSFC goes up after reaching peak torque.

My general conclusions and questions:

A - Can we infer % of max torque from TPS or LOD? (I would hope LOD is just that)

B - No conclusion, actually. Some engines may stay in their peak island with three gears, some may need more.

C - Besides higher BSFC during acceleration, it takes longer to get into top gears

D - I had assumed shifting to keep rpm's averaged at peak torque was optimum. I now think shifting *at* peak torque will result better FE.
__________________
Roll on,
Stew

  Reply With Quote