View Single Post
Old 12-30-2009, 06:08 PM   #24 (permalink)
cfg83
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Saturn SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 40.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 532 Times in 358 Posts
aerohead -

Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
Maybe every vehicle should be considered on a case by case basis.
The car shown is a rally car.Past Ford rally cars suffered higher drag as a compromise to cornering downforce from induced-lift.
Front airdams,as reported in industry literature typically reduce drag on non-bellypan cars,then at some point,begin to increase drag as their frontal area grows beyond some point. Bondo found this to be true on his F-150.
Some writers discourage the use of "rules-of-thumb" and advocate that every vehicle be investigated on a case by case basis.
It IS MY OPINION the the airdam pictured WOULD increase drag and degrade mpg.JMO.
Yup. I was reading about the Opel Calibra, a car famous (among us) in the early '90's for having a Cd of 0.26 . When they were designing the front air dam, they came across this very issue. They found that if it was too low, the drag from the air dam overcame it's benefits. It's job is to get the air past all the messy engine and front suspension components. Once it has done that, it doesn't need to be any bigger. If we did a detailed analysis of the Opel Calibra, we would probably be able to come up with a simple rule-of-thumb equation.

I read this in Car Styling issue #192, which has a continuing series on car aerodynamics :



CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to cfg83 For This Useful Post:
DieselFan (09-01-2011)