View Single Post
Old 01-06-2010, 12:30 AM   #8 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Thanks for the more in-depth explanation. So, you do have access to more throttle if needed. Good.

Still, in my driving conditions, sometimes I'm bucking nasty headwind or xwind, sometimes not. Sometimes heavily loaded, sometimes not. While I have no TPS readout I'm certain my cruise throttle "settings" vary with every trip, independent of speed. Were my car to have a fixed cruise throttle position, it would cruise at different speeds. I would rather choose my cruise speed on each trip.

Additionally, guys with instrumentation tell us that more vigorous acceleration actually is more efficient than creeping up to speed, especially with m/t vehicles.

So, yeah, I do think it was a nice try but I don't see it really coming through, at least for my conditions. That you were not able to provide any before/after fe results, much less A-B-A, doesn't help.
__________________


  Reply With Quote