View Single Post
Old 01-10-2010, 03:10 AM   #6 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,556 Times in 2,218 Posts
I disagree.

As in the example of the racing Fusion, going "out back" instead of up should reduce the area of the rear of the vehicle that experiences turbulence MORE than going "up", hence it should be a more effective drag reducer and fe increaser. After all, if the rear edge of this extension (no matter if it goes up and/or back) goes out to the "template", the rear window/over the trunk zone should "see" decent flow as in pickups with tonneaus.

I would go so far as to say, don't raise the lid at all, just go back... but it may have to go back unacceptably far to reach the template outline... THAT is when you consider raising it.
__________________


  Reply With Quote