View Single Post
Old 03-21-2008, 06:21 PM   #13 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,761

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,548 Times in 2,215 Posts
Sorry, I haven't been able to review the link RH provided.

waffle: What I'm wondering is why a lower ft/s isn't better yet? Less friction, fewer explosions, etc.

randy: thanks for the explanation, I still am not fluent in what exactly mep means to efficiency.

The root of my question started with knowing my car is geared for 1000-1200 ft/s at 50-60 mph. Seems perfect right from the factory doesn't it? Yet our pet theories for increased fe mods almost always include taller gearing. WTH?
__________________



Last edited by Frank Lee; 03-21-2008 at 09:36 PM..
  Reply With Quote