Thread: Longer Stroke?
View Single Post
Old 01-20-2010, 01:34 PM   #13 (permalink)
wagonman76
Master EcoModder
 
wagonman76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northwest Lower Michigan
Posts: 1,006

Red Car - '89 Chevrolet Celebrity CL 4 door
Team Chevy
90 day: 36.47 mpg (US)

Winter Wagon - '89 Pontiac 6000 LE Wagon
90 day: 28.26 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 17 Times in 16 Posts
My experience is that the longer stroke does help. I noticed this over 10 years ago, long before trying to hypermile.

The only difference between the 2.8 and 3.1 MPFI engines is the stroke. Same everything else. With all else equal on the car, they run off the same ECM and chip.

I have had several A-body wagons and sedans with these engines and in every case the 3.1 has a lot more torque and gets better mpg than the 2.8. All had the same trans with 3.33 final drive. Miles on the engine did not matter. The 3.1 can climb most any grade in OD and seems to move along effortlessly. It feels like a workhorse, like a diesel. The 2.8 is pretty much hopeless in that department.
__________________

Winter daily driver, parked most days right now


Summer daily driver
  Reply With Quote