View Single Post
Old 03-23-2008, 09:44 PM   #105 (permalink)
diesel_john
MP$
 
diesel_john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 594
Thanks: 5
Thanked 19 Times in 14 Posts
Send a message via MSN to diesel_john
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duffman View Post
I definately think that the MAF approach is the easierst way to go and would work fine if the engine didnt deviate away from stoichiometric A/F ratio but I think that is a bad assumption. I think a carb is much more likely to have A/F ratio fluctuations than FI.
totally agree,
but more convincing than a vacuum gage, when i see pounds of fuel disappearing per unit time or distance.
  Reply With Quote