Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ
You didn't graduate high-school, did you?
Seriously - you need to do some research, and ask a real tuner. Any one that's worth his title will know the same concepts we discuss here. Many of them do. You're basing your entire knowledge of engines on a handbook that was written for one vehicle and has no known references, which was meant for kids with mom's paycheck in hand, or at least that's what you've shown so far.
If you're only going to show this type of ignorance in your next 25 posts, I'm sure many of us would just as soon you didn't post at all.
Why exactly did you join this forum? You don't see people from EM going to performance websites and bagging on the things they do, do you?
You have no backing, no experience that you've shown, and no valid reason for believing any of the things you've said in this thread, nor the other one that I discussed with you. You've shown pure disdain for every piece of information that has backing in physical science, you've denied reality and instead, substituted your own.
I'm sorry, but unless you change your tone, nobody here will take you any more seriously than a troll.
It's Ok that you disagree with known concepts. Disagreement spawns discussion, which spawns advancement. It's not OK that you disagree, have no basis outside of opinion and conjecture for that disagreement, have shown a lack of respect for the forum in general, and can't even back up what you say with a valid reference.
Mods, if I'm over the line here, please let me know, and I'll do what's necessary to fix it.
|
Can't say I didn't see this coming.
I was waiting for you to respond to this. In doing so, you're identifying with blatant ignorance. This goes both ways. You seem to be very self-rightous in the way that you've attacked me, as if it's me who is against discussion when I'm actively participating and questioning the logic behind the methods passed through word of mouth. (Or keyboard) By discrediting my source, you have turned your back on my argument, labeling it as a "kid's" book. I can assure you that this isn't my only one. Where are your sources? You told me somebody's gonna swing by and give me them eventually. In that case,
you have no backing to prove me wrong. It frustrates you. What I could do is
ask a real tuner to come over here and clarify my points. He/she will say the same thing as I have, because those are the people that taught me how it's done. Hopefully the name "troll" won't describe my profile. Looking back, I tried to make amends with you by stating that I'd look into your side of the argument before proceeding, but you hit me with another post and kept going. Guess you overlooked that. Using you as an example to represent EM in another forum would send a bad impression and more than likely embarass the community. Talking about you, I see lots of pompous, big-headed talk of how I don't have any proof or an educational background,
but as our debates progress, you have less of substance, more of a desire to simply win an argument with me than to prove a point. With that said...
Go bring me some evidence, chap.