View Single Post
Old 02-07-2010, 11:53 AM   #25 (permalink)
silverinsight2
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: usa
Posts: 105
Thanks: 18
Thanked 30 Times in 19 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
Also, I doubt you're going to see any reversed flow on the end of the hatchback (upper) glass. Did you get a chance to try it (tuft testing)?

The smoke trace shows boundary thickening, but I can't see how there would be separation/reversal/recirculation there.
There is energized airflow here. The whole length of my rear window stays clear of rain at speed.



Five AirTab vortex generators were placed across the trailing edge of the rear hatch.

Quote:
After fitting the vortex generators, the measured trip fuel consumption immediately rose to 3.0 - 3.1 litres/100 km, a 3-7 per cent increase over the 2.9 litres/100km average. No change in the feel of the car could be felt - there was no apparent improvement in stability, reduction in wake noise or any other positives. Simply put, the vortex generators made things worse.
Julian Edgar


Also a little information about Insight bellypans and rear tire airdams.
autospeed.com


Last edited by silverinsight2; 02-08-2010 at 08:26 AM..
  Reply With Quote