View Single Post
Old 02-10-2010, 02:35 AM   #42 (permalink)
Christ
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think what "they say" is usually wrong. There's really not that much difference in the brain's energy consumption when thinking hard and when "not thinking". There' are several reasons for this. For one, a lot of the energy the brain consumes is used just to keep all the neurons alive. They're constantly producing electrochemical signals (action potentials). Thinking is more about changing the signal patterns than increasing the number of signals.

Then there's the ongoing stream of consciousness thinking that really isn't active problem solving. There's also a lot of non-thinking activity going on all the time, for instance the visual cortex constantly processes input regardless of whether you're thinking about what you see.

One thing that does use more energy, though, is long-term learning, since that is actively changing the structure of the brain.

Something we're obviously not doing in this thread.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote